Archaeopteryx is a genus between Dromaeosauridae (a small clade of theropod dinosaurs) and birds. It is beautiful evidence for evolution which puts it on creationists shit lists. An Archaeopteryx fossil Argument 1: The Archaeopteryx fossil was faked. Which one? There are 9. Found in multiple places and at different times[2]. Of course they may be [...]

About time I did another one of these. It is strange that some religious people will call something that is not a religion a religion in order to demean it. They them selfs have a religion yet they try to lessen the validity of evolution by calling it a religion. If "religion" is a pejorative [...]

Its been a while since I've done one of these so its about time that I did. Occam's razer says the simplest explanations are usually right, creation is the simplest explanation. Actually Occam's razer says: "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate" or "plurality should not be posited without necessity." what that means can be best [...]

Really? Then some one needs to tell these transitional fossils that they don't actually exist.

I do not like to repeat my self, I don't want to make posts that say something I've already said in a post and I've already cover what a theory is but this argument is so pervasive that it must be addressed. Plus I'm not getting the views I thought I would at this point [...]

Hitler and Stalin used evolution to justify there genocides. The argument is linked to "evolution is racist" and "evolution makes you immoral" arguments. The argument is bullshit and it uses that bullshit as a bad company fallacy. Lets start with Hitler: Hitler did accept evolution but not the scientific theory and fact of evolution. As [...]

Its not the same subject as 23 but I accidentally used 23 twice and discovered it 11 posts later so instead of renaming 11 posts I added a ".2" to this one. This argument is often used to try and disprove the scientific understanding of the age of the earth. Carbon dating (or radiocarbon dating) [...]

Some times this argument would be fallowed by examples of things we know have been created. The central stupidity of this argument is the assumption that the universe and everything in it has been created. This is a snow flake. It looks designed, everything about it looks like some one made it but no one [...]

*Massive face palm* Ow! You see what you did? You made me hurt my self. Evolution is decent with modification (This is the fact of evolution, it has been observed), the theory of evolution is modification and natural selection, natural selection the proses where traits that increase an organisms chances of survival and passing on [...]

This stupid argument attempts to prove or at least give evidence for creationism but it fails. It fails for two reasons. 1. It is an argument from authority fallacy. Just because "X" scientist accepts creationism or evolution doesn't mean creationism or evolution is right. Science is about evidence not authority. 2. Most of the scientists [...]