If the fossil record goes against your evidence, deny they exist. If some one points the fossil record out, claim they or are not what they actually are. This is what creationists do. The fossil record is strong evidence for evolution and it large. Piltdown man: It was a hoax, this is true. This was [...]

People who are against evolution like to use the words "evolutionism" or "darwinism" to describe evolution and call people who accept evolution "evolutionists" or "darwinists". This is similar to calling evolution a religion. It's a method of trying to discredit evolution or bring evolution down to a the level of philosophy, belief or religion. Evolution [...]

Really? Then some one needs to tell these transitional fossils that they don't actually exist.

We started off like an ameba and we’re getting bigger and better and stronger and smarter -Kent Hovind (click "Creation Seminars" then click "Seminar Part 1 - The Age of the Earth", its at about 5:40) Warning: Massive amounts of burning stupid! Um... Nnoooo. The theory of evolution states that animals adapt to there environment [...]

This is a stupid argument you get when you point out that evolution has been witnessed, that we have many examples of evolution in action. If you gave example of evolution like transplanted Italian wall lizards evolving cecal valves, speciation in a ring species like Ensatina salamanders, Flavobacterium evolving the ability to metabolize Nylon-6 or [...]

There are 2 stupid arguments when it comes to information. 1. Mutations can not increase information. This is completely false. We know how information can be added to DNA: gene duplication and mutation. 2. The genetic code contains information. This information could not assemble it self. First of all information isn't a thing, it's a [...]

This stupid argument comes from two misconceptions, both of which I've dealt with before (Evolution part 4: Thermodynamics and Order From Disorder) but it wouldn't be much of a post if I just posted links so I'll have to deal with them again. This stupid arguments deals with the second law of thermodynamics. The second [...]

Kent Hovind is a tax dodging creationist lier. If you've never heard of him, just do a Google or (better) a Youtube search for him. One of many of Kent Hovind's bullshit arguments is the 6 types of evolution. I tried to find a video Hovind using the argument but couldn't find one (I didn't [...]

Evolution leads to atheism and atheism The first thing wrong with this stupid argument is that its a slippery slope fallacy. Even if it were true, it has no baring on the validity of the theory or fact of evolution. The biggest flaw in the argument is that evolution doesn't lead to atheism. The fact [...]