Stupid Creationist Arguments 39: Where you there?

How do scientists know that? No one was there to see it, no one was there to see something evolve, no one was there to see life form, no one was there to see the big bang, etc.

Copyright of Lone WolfDo you need to see a person walking across a beach to know someone walked across a beach or are foot prints in the sand enough? You do not need to see something directly to know it happened. We can see the effects of things and hypothesize their causes. By creating predictions based on those hypotheses and testing those predictions we can come up with a tested explanation for the effects we see. This is what science does, its called the scientific method.

The biggest problem with this argument (evolution wise) is that we have seen it! We have seen beneficial mutations in the lab and in nature, we have seen populations speciate. Evolution has been witnessed. This is what makes evolution a fact and a theory. Facts in science are observations, and theories explain those observations.
© 2009 all rights reserved

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

One Response to “Stupid Creationist Arguments 39: Where you there?”

  1. [...] To repeat my self: you do not have to see something to know it has happened. Just as crimes can be solved by looking at the evidence and using the evidence to figure out what happened and who did it. However speciation has been observed. [...]

Leave a Reply

*

image
Join the best atheist themed blogroll!
AtheistSites.com