There is no evidence (zero, nada…its all been proven wrong) for evolution except

for taxonomy, genetics, fossils, geographic distribution and of course observed instances of evolution including observed instances speciation.[1][2][3]

evolution except “micro evolution”

Microevolution: Changes with in a population beneath the species level. Macroevolution: Changes above the species level. They are no longer used by scientists as the mechanisms behind both of them are the same.[4]

or variations within kinds

Define “kinds”.

Dr Hovind is dead right!

“Dr” Hovend got his doctorate from an unicredit diploma mill called Patriot University and he is in jail for tax evasion. Ironic isn’t it?

The truth is that, In the Beginning God created everything

It is not enough to say it or believe it, you have to show evidence for your claims .

In the Beginning nothing created

You know, a straw man arguments doesn’t actually deal with actual arguments, observations and theories. No scientist would say such a thing , only creationist liars and those who uncritically accept the lies they spew.[5]

1. http://anthro.palomar.edu/evolve/evolve_3.htm
2. http://lonewolfsden.net/2010/10/03/stupid-creationist-arguments-49-no-new-species-have-evolved/
3. http://lonewolfsden.net/2010/01/21/stupid-creationist-arguments-there-are-no-transitional-fossils/
4. http://lonewolfsden.net/2008/09/18/evolution-part-3-micro-and-macro/
5. http://lonewolfsden.net/2009/10/30/stupid-creationist-arguments-1-something-from-nothing-or-is-it/

The truth is that, In the Beginning God created everything….how hard is that to believe compared to….In the Beginning nothing created…its a no brainer!

Your theory of “changes in populations over time” has everything to do with “the big bang, nucleosynthesis, planetary formation and abiogenesis”, because your theory just assumes all of those to be true. Is this correct? If not, then you best not call it the “Theory of Evolution” and make that necessary distinction that Kent Hovind did, and call it the “Theory of Microevolution”, so that the evidence you have of variation amongst species can be used to prove true that there is… Variation amongst the species over time -not so it can assume the others exist.

You stated above that you looked for information, but couldn’t find it….but then you go on to argue against the information that you haven’t even heard!

Nnooo. I said I looked for a video of Hovind using the arguments and couldn’t find one. I could easly find a rebuttal video using Hovnd’s video but this post is a rebuttal.

If you actually listened to Dr. Hovind’s argument, you would find that he is dead correct in his science!

The other thing you seem to be forgetting is that the theory of evolution is just that….A THEORY! How about taking the time to listen first…and then if you still think your argument has a leg to stand upon, feel free. Until then, you should just stay quiet.

Dead wrong. First of all: the theory of evolution is a biological theory that explains observed instances of evolution (changes in populations over time) with mutations and natural selection. It has nothing to do with the big bang, nucleosynthesis, planetary formation and abiogenesis. Second: In science theories are not guesses or conjecture, they are heavily tested explanations for observed phenomena. This is the basic bare bones of the theory of evolution and you can’t even get that right. This information is not hidden, it is readily available to any one who actually looks it up
When it comes to Hovend’s “science”, he fails epically.

To support Dr. Hovind: This is typical of MOST of the people arguing against him. You are simply babbling about something you know nothing about!

If you actually listened to Dr. Hovind’s argument, you would find that he is dead correct in his science!

The other thing you seem to be forgetting is that the theory of evolution is just that….A THEORY! How about taking the time to listen first…and then if you still think your argument has a leg to stand upon, feel free. Until then, you should just stay quiet. You’re simply displaying your own stupidity!

Jim Scranton, PhD in Molecular Sciences