Kent Hovind is a tax dodging creationist lier. If you've never heard of him, just do a Google or (better) a Youtube search for him. One of many of Kent Hovind's bullshit arguments is the 6 types of evolution.
I tried to find a video Hovind using the argument but couldn't find one (I didn't look that hard) but I found one of his son using the argument with [sarcasm]pretty, pretty animation[/sarcasm].
Well lets get to it.
1. Cosmic Evolution: The origin of time space an matter.
Right off the bat: bullshit. The theory of evolution is a biological theory, not a cosmic one.
2. Chemical Evolution: The origin of all the elements we have today.
Um... No. Fusion reactions in the cores of stars fuse smaller elements like hydrogen into larger elements.
You notice (if you watched the video) that the animation shows molecules? Is he confusing molecules with elements? Is it the animator thats confused? Do they just not care because there going for an audience that doesn't know the difference?
3. Stellar Evolution: The origin of stars and planets.
Umm... Nnooo. Stellar evolution is how a star ages though its life time and it has nothing to do with the theory of evolution.
4. Organic Evolution: The origin of life from non-life.
Again: nnooo. Thats abiogenesis. By the way: in chemistry organic means "a compound containing carbon."
5. Macro Evolution: The origin of the major kinds of animals and plants.
At last! Biology!
What the hell is a kind? Is it a species? Genus? Family? Order? I'll assume it means "species" for the moment.
And nnnoooooo. Macro evolution is evolution between species; basically its speciation.
6. Micro Evolution: subtle variation within the kinds.
At last! he got something right! Assuming "kind" means species and ignore "subtle".
micro evolution is the only one that has been observed and tested.
Damn! Speciation has been observed multiple times, in the lab and in nature.